Skip to content
Macksofy Technologies
Bengaluru · AI Pentest
CERT-In EmpanelledBengaluru

AI / LLM Security Testing in Bengaluru · SaaS & GCC

OWASP LLM Top 10 and MITRE ATLAS red-teaming for the LLM chatbots, RAG pipelines and agentic products Bengaluru's SaaS, fintech and GCC teams ship to production.

In short

What is AI Pentest in Bengaluru?

AI penetration testing assesses applications built on large language models for prompt injection, insecure output handling, data leakage, and agent/tool abuse, following the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications. In Bengaluru, Macksofy scopes and delivers the engagement to local regulators, procurement, and timelines — with proof-of-concept findings, board-ready reporting, and a remediation retest.

01
LLM Top 0
OWASP + MITRE ATLAS mapped
02
Multi-tenant
RAG leakage focus
03
0-day
Free guardrail retest
04
Same-week
Onsite from Mumbai
AI Pentest in Bengaluru

How a Macksofy ai pentest engagement runs in Bengaluru.

Bengaluru builds more of India's production AI than anywhere else — the LLM copilots inside B2B SaaS, the RAG assistants embedded in fintech apps, and the agentic tooling being stood up inside US and EU global capability centres. Macksofy's AI practice tests those systems the way an attacker meets them: not a generic web pentest with the word 'AI' bolted on, but a targeted assault on the model behind your chatbot, the retrieval pipeline that feeds it context, the tools your agent can invoke, and the fine-tune and embedding supply chain underneath. Every finding is mapped to the OWASP LLM Top 10 and MITRE ATLAS so your AI-safety lead and your CISO read the same report.

The Bengaluru buyer is technical and hands-on — AppSec leads and staff engineers who shortlist vendors that publish methodology and OSCP/OSWE-grade credentials, not procurement decks. So we lead with the attack chain, not the brochure. On a typical product engagement we chain prompt injection into tool-call abuse into data exfiltration: a poisoned support-ticket or a crafted RAG document reaches the model as instructions, the agent is coaxed into invoking a privileged function on the user's behalf (the confused-deputy pattern), and customer data or system-prompt secrets leak out through an output channel the guardrail never inspected.

RAG is where most Bengaluru SaaS products are quietly exposed. Multi-tenant retrieval is the recurring failure — one tenant's query surfacing another tenant's embedded documents because the vector store's access-control lives in application code the LLM path bypasses. We test cross-tenant retrieval leakage directly, run embedding-space attacks (adversarial same-meaning queries that dodge keyword filters), probe indirect injection via poisoned corpus documents, and review the vector DB's own authorization model rather than trusting the app layer to enforce it.

Agentic and function-calling products get the deepest scrutiny because they can act, not just talk. We fuzz function-call schemas, test tool-chain confused-deputy paths where the agent wields a privileged tool with the user's authority, enumerate and abuse exposed MCP servers, and attempt sandbox escape from any code-execution tool the agent can reach. For fintech agents that touch money movement or KYC, an unintended tool call is not a chatbot glitch — it is a transaction, and we scope it as one.

The supply chain underneath the model is in scope by default. We review the provenance of HuggingFace weights and embedding models, look for training-data poisoning vectors in fine-tune pipelines, and run membership-inference and model-inversion tests to see whether the training corpus leaks PII — a live DPDP Act exposure for any Bengaluru product handling Indian customer data, and a GDPR one for GCCs serving EU users. Cost-amplification is tested too: long-context and tool-loop abuse that turns your inference bill into a denial-of-wallet attack.

Bengaluru GCCs carry the extra weight of a parent's AI-governance program — NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001, and increasingly the EU AI Act's high-risk-system controls. We format the engagement so the India centre's evidence drops straight into the parent's governance framework: a threat model mapped to OWASP LLM Top 10 and ATLAS, per-finding reproducer prompts, and a control-mapping annex the group CISO's team can attest against without a translation layer. For Series-A to Series-D SaaS entering enterprise sales, the same report answers the AI-security section of the customer security questionnaires that now gate every deal.

We don't just hand back findings — we co-build the guardrails. Every exploitable finding ships with a suggested guardrail prompt, an output-validator rule (PII, secrets, prompt-leak, toxicity classifiers), and a sandboxing or rate-limit pattern your platform team can deploy the same week. Guardrail retesting inside 30 days is in the base statement of work: we re-run the attack against your fix at no extra cost, because a guardrail that was never adversarially retested is a guardrail you're only guessing about. Senior consultants run the engagement end to end and fly in for kickoff and readout — same-week onsite from Mumbai, no bait-and-switch staffing.

Engagement workflow

Five phases. Bengaluru timeline.

Every Macksofy ai pentest engagement in Bengaluru runs through the same phased protocol — adapted to Bengaluru-specific procurement, regulator and delivery realities.

  1. Phase 01Week 1

    Threat model & scope

    • Architecture review of model, RAG pipeline, agent tools, fine-tune pipeline and deployment surface
    • Data-flow map: training data, embeddings, vector store, output channels and tenant boundaries
    • Threat model aligned to OWASP LLM Top 10 + MITRE ATLAS, cross-referenced to the parent GCC's AI-governance framework
    • Rules of engagement + a safe test tenant so probing never touches real customer data
  2. Phase 02Weeks 1–2

    Prompt injection & jailbreak

    • Direct and indirect (RAG-borne) prompt injection against every LLM entry point
    • Jailbreak sweep — roleplay, encoding, multi-turn and system-prompt-extraction attempts
    • Output-format hijack (markdown, link, image, tool-schema injection)
  3. Phase 03Weeks 2–3

    RAG & multi-tenancy

    • Cross-tenant retrieval leakage testing against the vector store's own authorization
    • Embedding-space adversarial-query attacks and poisoned-document indirect injection
    • Vector-DB access-control and secrets-in-context review
  4. Phase 04Weeks 3–4

    Agentic & supply chain

    • Function-call schema fuzzing and tool-chain confused-deputy testing
    • MCP server enumeration/abuse and code-execution sandbox-escape attempts
    • Model/embedding provenance, training-data poisoning, membership-inference and PII-leak probing
  5. Phase 05Weeks 4–5

    Guardrail co-build & retest

    • Per-finding reproducer prompt, suggested guardrail prompt and output-validator rule
    • Output-classifier coverage and cost-amplification / denial-of-wallet testing
    • Free guardrail retest within 30 days against the deployed fix
Industries served

Which Bengaluru verticals we deliver AI Pentest for.

B2B SaaS & product

LLM copilots, in-app assistants and multi-tenant RAG features shipped to enterprise customers who now audit AI security in the buying cycle.

Fintech (lending, payments, neo-banking)

Agentic and RAG assistants that touch KYC, underwriting and money-movement flows — where an unintended tool call is a transaction, not a glitch.

GCC (US + EU enterprise)

AI features and platforms built in Bengaluru against a parent's NIST AI RMF / ISO 42001 / EU AI Act governance program.

Healthtech & edtech

Consumer-facing AI handling health and minor data — high-sensitivity training corpora and strict PII-leak requirements.

What ships

The Bengaluru deliverable pack.

Every Bengaluru ai pentest engagement closes with the pack below — regulator-ready evidence, technical detail and board-readable summaries.

  • AI/LLM threat model mapped to OWASP LLM Top 10 + MITRE ATLAS
  • Per-finding writeup with a working reproducer prompt and CVSS-style severity
  • Multi-tenant RAG leakage assessment with vector-store authorization findings
  • Agentic tool-abuse and MCP/sandbox findings for function-calling products
  • Training-data / supply-chain review (poisoning, provenance, PII-leak, membership inference)
  • Suggested guardrail prompts + output-validator rules per exploitable finding
  • Control-mapping annex for NIST AI RMF / ISO 42001 / EU AI Act (GCC governance)
  • Free guardrail retest report within 30 days
Recent Bengaluru engagement

A Bengaluru ai pentest case study.

Bengaluru-headquartered Series-C B2B SaaS — multi-tenant RAG copilot
Scope

Full AI/LLM assessment of a customer-facing RAG assistant and its function-calling actions across a multi-tenant vector store; OWASP LLM Top 10 + MITRE ATLAS coverage with guardrail co-build

Outcome

Cross-tenant retrieval leak and a confused-deputy tool path (agent invoking an admin export on the user's behalf) proven and closed inside the remediation window; output-validator and guardrail-prompt rules deployed and retested within 30 days; the resulting report cleared the AI-security section of two stalled enterprise deals.

What clients say · Trusted India + UAE

Rated 4.9 ★ from 612 client reviews.

CERT-In Empanelled
Govt of India · MeitY
EC-Council ATC
Authorized Training
ISO 27001 Certified
Info Security Mgmt
We've worked with three Big 4 firms before Macksofy. None found what their team did in our payments stack. The most actionable report we've received in a decade.
AK
Aisha Khan
Information Security Manager · Listed Fintech · BKC, Mumbai
The CHFI training Macksofy delivered for our cyber cell raised investigation quality measurably. Practical, India-context-aware, and respectful of our operational realities.
RK
R. Karandikar
Cyber Cell · Maharashtra Police · Mumbai
Came in with zero security background. 5 weeks later I was running Burp Suite and Metasploit confidently. Cleared CEH on the first attempt.
VI
Vivek Iyer
DevSecOps Lead · Healthcare SaaS · Hyderabad
FAQ

Questions Bengaluru buyers ask before signing.

A web pentest checks the app around the model; an AI engagement tests the model and its context. We attack the live LLM behind your chatbot, the RAG pipeline that retrieves context, the tools your agent can invoke and the fine-tune/embedding supply chain — chaining prompt injection into tool-call abuse into data exfiltration. The failure modes (indirect injection, cross-tenant retrieval, confused-deputy tool use, training-data leakage) simply don't exist in a classic web scope, so they need a dedicated methodology mapped to the OWASP LLM Top 10 and MITRE ATLAS.
More services in Bengaluru

Other Macksofy engagements in Bengaluru.

AI Pentest in other cities

Same engagement, other Macksofy metros.

Talk to us

Get a fixed-price proposal in 48 hours.

Tell us about your security need — pentest, audit, training or a wider engagement. A senior consultant will reply within a few business hours.

CERT-In Empanelled
Information Security Auditor · India
  • CERT-In Empanelled
  • EC-Council ATC · CompTIA Authorized
  • 20,000+ professionals trained
  • India + UAE engagements
Human verification· Cloudflare Turnstile

By submitting this form you agree to be contacted by Macksofy. We typically respond within a few business hours and never share your details. Protected by Cloudflare Turnstile and rate limiting.